Two simple words, one heavy legacy. In this Cultural Snapshot, we deconstruct the phrase “good hair”—a term that has echoed through generations, carrying the weight of colorism, texture bias, and a longing for proximity to Eurocentric beauty standards. What does it really mean when we use this phrase, and why is it time to retire it for good?
The Shadow of Colorism
Historically, “good hair” was a term used to describe textures that were looser, silkier, and more easily managed—often hair that was a result of mixed heritage. It was a way to categorize and rank hair based on how closely it resembled straight hair. This created a painful hierarchy within communities, where those with tighter, more coily textures were told their hair was “bad” or “unruly.” By understanding the roots of this phrase, we can see how it has been used to divide and diminish the beauty of natural diversity.
Redefining the Standard
The modern natural hair movement is finally reclaiming the narrative. We are moving toward a world where “good hair” is simply healthy hair—hair that is loved, nurtured, and allowed to exist in its natural state. It’s about celebrating the strength of a tight coil and the elegance of a dense afro. By retiring the “good vs. bad” dichotomy, we open up a space where every texture is seen as a gift. The only “good hair” is the hair that makes you feel like your most authentic self. It’s time to let the old phrases go and embrace the beauty of everything we have.